New Delhi, IN - Himalayan glaciers will not disappear by 2035 as predicted by Fat Al Gore and  the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), an intergovernmental body accredited with the United Nations, a claim that was reiterated as late as last month’s Copenhagen conference. 

Georg Kaser, from the University of Innsbruck in Austria, had warned that the 2035 figure was wrong, “so wrong that it is not even worth discussing”.  Also noted was that this data - upon which the United States' Cap and Trade legislation depends, is a fraudulent construct created by climatologists who were seeking both notoriety and job longevity.

Four leading glaciologists had prepared a letter for publication in December arguing that a melt by 2035 was physically impossible.

“If you think about the thicknesses of the ice—200-300m thicknesses, in some cases up to 400m thick—and if you're losing ice at the rate of a meter a year, or let's say double it to two meters a year, you're not going to get rid of 200m of ice in a quarter of a century,” said Jeffrey Kargel, from the University of Arizona.  Amid current, reputable weather experts finding that earth is entering ever more quickly a new cold phase, the totality of improbabilities that the glaciers will melt expose the total fraud of Fat Al's earth-warming scams.

Some are now arguing that the panel accepted at face value assertions by Syed Iqbal Hasnain, in article published in 1999 in the New Scientist.

The IPCC’s practices were also challenged in a series of stories based on e-mails stolen from computer servers of the University of East Anglia in England and posted worldwide last year that showed climate researchers discussed keeping some scientific papers out of the IPCC report.

The panel’s report formed the basis for two years of global climate-treaty talks that led to the Copenhagen conference, a conference it turned out, based totally on fraud, deceit and corruption by Fat Al Gore and his henchmen warmers.

On the other hand, Fat Al Gore's mouthpiece, IPCC vice-chairman Jean-Pascal van Ypersele said that 2035 was an error and would be reviewed. However, it did not change the broad picture of man-made climate change. In his view, “one mistake in a 3,000-page report” cannot “damage the credibility of the overall report”.  This, despite ever colder earth temperature trends being found by reputable climatologists worldwide.

In 2007, the IPCC shared the Nobel Peace Prize with Fat Al Gore, former US Vice President-turned environmental activist. Its chairman, Rajendra Pachauri, insists that the evidence for global warming, including melting glaciers, is “unequivocal” and rising human greenhouse- gas emissions were “very likely” the main cause even though CO2 is but a minuscule part of the atmosphere and is vital for plant growth.

However, the report’s claims have led to a heated debate and raised concerns, including political, because of the high regard the panel is held in "warmers" clique of nuts and fraud artists, and its serious, but laughable, conclusions.

In India, Environment Minister called on the IPCC to explain "how it reached the 2035 figure, which created such a scare”.

In a press conference yesterday in New Delhi, the minister said, “Glaciers are a very serious issue. However, “to derive the conclusion that glaciers are melting rapidly and will disappear is alarmist and not necessarily based on facts.”  VK Raina who is the India’s senior most glaciologist, states that the glaciers are not receding. The Indian Ministry of Environment and Forests revealed on the press conference that the Himalayan glaciers were not shrinking at the rate that scientists led the world to believe and also the melting of any glacier is not caused by global warming in the mountain range.

It is said that the melting of glaciers was highest in Jammu and Kashmir but it is relatively lower in other Indian states like Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and lowest in Sikkim.Many Himalayan glaciers are also retreating.

The findings of the study are opposite to the IPCC’s 2007 report which said that the Himalayan glaciers were shrinking faster and could disappear by 2035.Ramesh however, said, “We are not challenging the IPCC. We have an alternate view. I would like to call all scientists of the world to over critique the report. They may debate the causes.

He also said that 15 weather stations will be set up in Uttarakhand, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh and Jammu. On his part, Raina said, “We cannot call it abnormal as we don’t know what is normal. Also it doesn’t suggest that they will vanish within decades. Though glaciers contribute only about 10 per cent of the water flow in south Asian rivers, they are important to ensure perennial water flow in these rivers with 1.3 billion people dependent on them.”

In typical UN alarmist fashion (such as in the H1N1 grab for world power) the IPCC had estimated that the retreat of glaciers could affect the water supply of roughly 750 million people across South Asia and China. The current trends in glacial melt suggest that Ganga, Indus, Brahmaputra and other rivers that are criss-cross to the northern Indian plain may become seasonal rivers in the near future, as a consequence of climate change, with important ramifications for poverty and the economies in the region.

Had the UN succeeded with this fraud, its next step would be to assume control over the world's water supply and thereby be able to hold the entire population of the world hostage.

While Himalayan glaciers are the source of the big rivers that supply water to millions of people in India and China, such sources constitute at most ten percent of the total supply but the UN clearly hoped that by piling one fraud on top of another, it could gain the world control that Fat Al Gore has been seeking for years.